Skip to main content
Browse all

AI Prompt Cost Calculator

FREEDeveloper
TOOLAI Prompt Cost Calculator
224 chars

Input Tokens

49

Output Tokens

500

Total Tokens

549

500 tokens
50 tokens4,000 tokens

How many tokens the AI generates in response

100 calls
1 calls10,000 calls

For monthly cost projection

$Cheapest Option

GPT-4o Mini

$0.0003 per call / $0.922 per month

99% cheaper than the most expensive option

Sort by:
#Model$/1M$/1MPer CallMonthly
1
ECO

GPT-4o MiniCHEAPEST

OpenAI

$0.15$0.6$0.0003$0.922
2
ECO

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

Google

$0.25$1.5$0.0008$2.29
3
ECO

Gemini 3.1 Flash

Google

$0.75$3$0.0015$4.61
4
ECO

Claude Haiku 4.5

Anthropic

$1$5$0.0025$7.65
5
MID

GPT-4o

OpenAI

$2.5$10$0.0051$15.37
6
MID

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Google

$2$12$0.0061$18.29
7
MID

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Anthropic

$3$15$0.0076$22.94
8
PRO

GPT-5

OpenAI

$15$60$0.031$92.20
9
PRO

Claude Opus 4.6

Anthropic

$15$75$0.038$114.7

Monthly Cost Comparison (100 calls/day)

Mini
$0.922
Flash-Lite
$2.29
Flash
$4.61
4.5
$7.65
GPT-4o
$15.37
Pro
$18.29
4.6
$22.94
GPT-5
$92.20
4.6
$114.7
Premium
Balanced
Budget
Cheapest
Premium

Highest intelligence, complex reasoning

GPT-5$0.031
Claude Opus 4.6$0.038

Avg. monthly cost

$103.45

Balanced

Strong performance, reasonable cost

GPT-4o$0.0051
Gemini 3.1 Pro$0.0061
Claude Sonnet 4.6$0.0076

Avg. monthly cost

$18.87

Budget

Fast and affordable for simple tasks

GPT-4o Mini$0.0003
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite$0.0008
Gemini 3.1 Flash$0.0015
Claude Haiku 4.5$0.0025

Avg. monthly cost

$3.87

AI API Pricing Reference (April 2026)

Per 1M tokens. Prices from official provider pricing pages.

ModelProviderInput $/1MOutput $/1MOutput/Input Ratio
Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic$15$755.0x
GPT-5OpenAI$15$604.0x
Claude Sonnet 4.6Anthropic$3$155.0x
GPT-4oOpenAI$2.5$104.0x
Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle$2$126.0x
Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic$1$55.0x
Gemini 3.1 FlashGoogle$0.75$34.0x
Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteGoogle$0.25$1.56.0x
GPT-4o MiniOpenAI$0.15$0.64.0x
100% freeNo signupRuns in your browser

About AI Prompt Cost Calculator

AI API pricing varies significantly across providers and model tiers. Anthropic, OpenAI, and Google all charge separately for input tokens (prompt + context) and output tokens (generated response), with output typically priced 3-5x higher than input. Token count estimation — converting raw text to an approximate token count before sending an API request — is essential for budgeting pipelines that process large volumes of text. Understanding token costs across 9 major models enables informed model selection for different task tiers.

How It Works

Token count estimation uses a hybrid approach: character-based estimation (approximately 4 characters per token for English text) averaged with word-based estimation (approximately 1.33 tokens per English word). The two estimates are averaged to reduce the directional bias of each method individually. For English text, this approximation is typically within 5-10% of the actual tokenizer output.

The cost calculation multiplies the estimated input token count by the model's input price per million tokens, adds the output token estimate multiplied by the output price per million tokens, and multiplies by the daily call volume to project monthly spend (using 30 days as the month length).

Model pricing is hardcoded from official pricing pages as of April 2026. The comparison table sorts models by monthly cost, allowing quick identification of the cheapest model that meets quality requirements for a given task. Context window limits are also shown to flag models that cannot accommodate the estimated prompt size.

Who Is This For

A backend engineer pastes a proposed system prompt into the calculator to estimate the monthly API cost of a customer support chatbot handling 10,000 conversations per day before committing to a model.

A startup CTO compares the monthly cost of Claude Sonnet 4.6 versus GPT-4o for a document summarization pipeline processing 500,000 pages per month, to determine which model fits the unit economics.

A developer debugging an expensive pipeline identifies that a 2,000-token system prompt repeated on every call accounts for 40% of total cost, motivating a switch to prompt caching.

A product manager evaluates whether upgrading from Gemini Flash-Lite to Gemini Pro is financially justified for a specific workflow, using the calculator to quantify the monthly cost difference.

How to Use

1

Paste your prompt or system message into the text area to estimate input tokens

2

Set the expected output length using the slider (100-4000 tokens)

3

Set your expected API calls per day for monthly cost projection

4

Compare costs across 9 major AI models sorted by price, tier, or monthly spend

Frequently Asked Questions

The calculator uses a hybrid estimation method averaging character-based (~4 chars per token) and word-based (~1.3 tokens per word) counts. For exact counts, use the official tokenizer from each provider. Our estimate is typically within 10% of the actual count.
We include 9 major models as of April 2026: Claude Opus 4.6, Claude Sonnet 4.6, Claude Haiku 4.5 (Anthropic), GPT-5, GPT-4o, GPT-4o Mini (OpenAI), and Gemini 3.1 Pro, Flash, and Flash-Lite (Google).
AI providers charge more for output tokens because generating text requires more computation than processing input. The ratio typically ranges from 3x to 5x. This is why optimizing output length (asking for concise responses) can significantly reduce costs.
Use budget models (GPT-4o Mini, Gemini Flash-Lite) for simple tasks, reserve premium models for complex reasoning. Keep prompts concise, request shorter outputs, and use caching for repeated prompts. Batch requests where possible.
No. All calculations happen entirely in your browser. Your prompt text never leaves your device. This tool is completely client-side with zero server communication.
Pricing reflects official rates as of April 2026. AI model pricing changes frequently, so check the official pricing pages for the latest rates. We update this tool regularly.
Prompt caching (supported by Anthropic and OpenAI) stores frequently reused system prompt content server-side and charges a reduced rate for cache hits. Batch processing requests non-interactively at a 50% discount. Concise system prompts reduce input tokens on every request. These three techniques can reduce costs by 30-60% without changing model or output quality.
Input tokens are the tokens in your prompt and system message that the model reads. Output tokens are the tokens the model generates in its response. Output tokens are always priced higher — typically 3x to 5x — because text generation requires more computation than reading. Keeping responses concise (asking for bullet points instead of paragraphs) is the most impactful cost lever.

Run your projects on Claude Code?

We packaged the .claude config that runs this site — 26 specialist agents, 14 workflow skills, and 6 rule files from 31 real production incidents. From $9.

Get the Claude Code Production Pack — $29

Found this useful? Share it.

Share: