Every major item, with its status
The table below follows the PIB numbering. "Effective date" means a date the release itself states. Where the cell says "None stated", the release gives no start date at all.
Item 16 (circulars on ISD, bank ITC, pre-deposits, demonstration vehicles and rule 96(10)) and item 19 (tribunal alignment) are omitted from the table because they do not change a small taxpayer's day-to-day position.
The late fee waiver, in detail
Item 15 reads: waiver of late fee on delayed filing of a return under section 39(1) for taxpayers with annual turnover up to ₹5 crore in the preceding financial year, "if the said delayed return is filed by the end of the month in which it was due".[1]
Four things in that sentence do the work.
- It is turnover in the preceding financial year, not the current one. A business crossing ₹5 crore this year is judged on last year's figure.
- The cut-off is the last day of the due month, not a fixed number of days. A return due on the 20th gets about ten days in a 30-day month.
- It names returns under section 39(1) only. The release does not mention other returns.
- It says "late fee". The release says nothing about interest on tax paid late, so do not assume interest goes away. That is my reading of the text, not a statement from PIB.
An illustration, with made-up figures. A consultancy had ₹3.2 crore turnover last financial year and its GSTR-3B for a month is due on the 20th. It files on the 28th of that month. If the waiver is notified as described, it owes no late fee. If it files on the 3rd of the next month, the waiver does not apply and the normal late fee runs from the due date. Interest on any tax paid after the due date is a separate question the release does not address.
The waiver is not live. Until a notification is published, the existing late fee applies on the existing schedule. Our GST late fee and interest calculator shows what a late filing costs today, and the GST compliance calendar for 2026 lists the actual due dates so you can see how close to the line you are.
Show-cause notices below ₹10,000 and the lower penalty
Item 7.2 proposes amending sections 73, 74 and 74A to set a minimum of ₹10,000, counting CGST, SGST, IGST and cess together, for issuing a show-cause notice. In the Council's words, "no notices will be issued if the tax amount involved is less than Rs. 10,000". It also recommends a statutory provision so that notices and appeals under that amount that are already pending are decided as if the threshold had been in force when the notice went out.[1]
Read the boundary carefully. A demand for ₹9,999 would fall below the line. A demand for exactly ₹10,000 would not. Illustration: a notice for ₹8,500 of mismatch-driven tax would be dropped once the provision is in force, while a ₹14,000 notice would proceed as before.
The same item adds several penalty changes in non-fraud cases:
- penalty deemed a "charge" where the full tax, interest and penalty are paid voluntarily within the time limit;
- a reduced 5% penalty where tax and interest are paid within 30 days (section 73) or 60 days (section 74A) of the adjudication order;
- removal of the ₹10,000 minimum penalty condition in non-fraud cases;
- a cap of ₹40 crore on the pre-deposit for appeals where only penalty is in dispute (item 7.4), split ₹20 crore CGST and ₹20 crore SGST/UTGST.
Item 7.3 is the one most small businesses will meet: the maximum general penalty under section 125 falls from ₹25,000 to ₹10,000. Section 125 is the catch-all penalty for breaches that have no specific penalty of their own, so it is the one people see for procedural slips.
Export of services: the foreign branch change
This is the item freelancers and small agencies should read twice. Under item 10, the Council recommended omitting sub-clause (v) of section 2(6) of the IGST Act. That sub-clause says the supplier and recipient must not be establishments of a distinct person. PIB's explanation is direct: the change "will facilitate refunds for Indian services providers in respect of services supplied to/through their foreign offices/branches".[1]
Take a made-up case. A Pune design studio invoices its own Singapore branch ₹40 lakh a year for design work done in India. Today that branch is a distinct person of the studio, so the supply may not count as an export of services, and the zero-rating and refund route is blocked. If the clause is omitted, the supply could qualify as an export, and the studio could claim refunds on the ITC tied to it instead of treating the supply as taxable.
Be careful about what this does not say. The release removes one condition. It does not say the other export conditions disappear. Item 10 separately recommends a circular on receipt of payment in foreign exchange or, where permitted, Indian rupees, which suggests those rules still matter. Until the amendment text is public, keep your foreign-currency receipts and FIRC or bank advices exactly as you do now.
Two more items in item 10 help exporters. The place-of-supply exception in section 13(3)(a), which covers services on goods the recipient makes available to the supplier, would be omitted, so the default (location of the recipient) applies. That "will facilitate access to export-related benefits under GST for Indian service providers providing such services to foreign recipients". And an explanation to section 16(1) would treat goods delivered to an SEZ or free trade warehousing zone for an overseas buyer, paid for in convertible foreign exchange or rupees where RBI permits, as a supply to an SEZ.[1]
Item 13 is the quieter one. Transfer of title in intellectual property, "whether temporary or permanent", would be treated uniformly as a supply of services by amending Schedule II. If you sell or license designs, code, music or other IP to overseas clients, the service classification is what feeds the export logic above. To check the rate on any specific service, use the GST rate finder.
Inverted duty and refund changes
Inverted duty means the GST you pay on inputs is higher than the GST you charge on output. Today the refund of that accumulated credit covers inputs, not input services or capital goods. Item 8 recommends changing that.
The wording on the first date is specific: it applies to ITC "availed on input services on or after 1st November, 2026". So a credit you took in October 2026 is not covered, even if you file the refund claim later. This is why the date you took the credit in GSTR-3B matters, and why your records of it need to be clean.
An illustration for the capital goods rule. A manufacturer buys a machine in May 2027 with ₹90,000 of GST credit on an inverted-duty product line. If the rule is notified as described, the refundable credit would be spread over 60 months, which works out to ₹1,500 a month. The point is that the refund is slow by design. It eases working capital but does not release the cash in one go.
Item 6 is about speed. In phase 1, a full refund of excess cash ledger balance would be sanctioned automatically, and for zero-rated and inverted-duty claims 90% of the amount claimed would be sanctioned provisionally by the system on risk evaluation. The time for an acknowledgement or deficiency memo would fall from 15 to 10 days. Phase 2 moves to automated acknowledgement and full sanction for zero-rated claims.[1] Item 6.2 also recommends removing the cap that limits zero-rated goods turnover to 1.5 times the value of like goods supplied domestically, under rule 89(4)(C).
The ARQP scheme for small B2C sellers
Item 17 is easy to overstate. The release says the Council "approved in-principle a concept note" for an optional Annual Return Quarterly Payment scheme. It would cover taxpayers with aggregate turnover of ₹5 crore or less in the preceding financial year who deal exclusively in supplies to unregistered persons.[1] PIB gives no detail on return frequency, payment dates, how the annual return would work, or when it would start. A concept note is a starting point for drafting, so there is nothing to opt into and nothing to plan a filing calendar around yet.
What stays unknown
- No effective date for the late fee waiver, the notice threshold, the penalty cut, or the export definition change.
- The exact legal text of every amendment. PIB says it presents the items "in simple language".
- Whether the late fee waiver covers GSTR-1 and other returns, or only returns under section 39(1) (the release names only section 39(1)).
- How the ₹40 crore pre-deposit cap and the ₹10,000 threshold will treat cases already in progress, beyond the transitional wording quoted above.
- Whether anything has been notified since 8 October. I have not verified that, and you should check.
What to do this month
- Keep filing on the due date. The waiver has no notification. If you file late this month on the assumption it applies, you may pay the normal fee.
- Track notifications. The CBIC GST site publishes circulars and notifications[2]. Check it weekly, or ask your accountant to.
- Document the date you take each credit. The refund extensions turn on ITC availed on or after 1 November 2026 and 1 April 2027. Note the GSTR-3B month for every input service and capital goods credit.
- Do not retroactively re-book intra-group billing as exports. Wait for the amendment text. If you serve a foreign branch, list the invoices now so you can review them when the law changes.
- Reconcile GSTR-2B against your books. Item 5 aims at fewer mismatches from April 2027, but today's notices still follow today's rules. Our ITC deadline guide for FY 2025-26 sets out the 30 November cut-off, and the GST ITC Rescue Workbook for FY 2025-26 has a 2B-versus-books matcher if you do not already have one.
- Treat notices normally. If you get a small-demand notice before any threshold is notified, reply on time. Do not assume it will be dropped.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, tax, or legal advice. Consult a qualified professional for advice specific to your situation.
Frequently asked questions
Is the GST late fee waiver for turnover up to ₹5 crore in force?
No. PIB lists it as item 15, a Council recommendation. The release says recommendations take effect only through circulars, notifications or law amendments. No effective date is given. Keep filing by the due date until a notification is published.
Does the ₹5 crore limit use this year's or last year's turnover?
Last year's. Item 15 refers to annual turnover "in the preceding financial year". PIB item 17 uses the same preceding-year test for the ARQP concept note.
Can I treat services to my company's foreign branch as exports now?
Not yet. Item 10 recommends omitting section 2(6)(v) of the IGST Act, which would remove the distinct-person condition. Until the Act is amended, the current definition applies. Ask your CA before you change how you invoice or claim refunds.
What is the new minimum for a GST show-cause notice?
The Council recommended that no show-cause notice be issued under sections 73, 74 or 74A where the tax involved (CGST, SGST, IGST and cess together) is below ₹10,000. A demand of exactly ₹10,000 is not below the threshold. This also needs a law amendment.
What is the maximum penalty under section 125 now?
Today it is ₹25,000. The Council recommended reducing it to ₹10,000 (item 7.3). That is a recommendation, so the current ₹25,000 cap applies until the law changes.
Does the 1 November 2026 date mean refunds start on that day?
No. Item 8.2 says the inverted-duty refund on input services applies to ITC availed on or after 1 November 2026. It is a cut-off for which credits qualify, not a date from which you can file. The amendment still has to be made.
Sources
- PIB (Ministry of Finance), Recommendations of the 57th Meeting of the GST Council, 8 October 2026 (accessed 18 October 2026)
- CBIC GST: notifications and circulars
Comments · 0
Beta: comments are stored locally on your device and not visible to other readers.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.